A "new" knot, or not.

[knot4u]

@xarax

@knot4u post:39

This knot of yours was posted here

It is not a knot of mine…It is a well known variation of Double Harness bend, although not seen very frequently.( AND, I have to repeat it because you seem to read only 1 out of 30 words I write, :), there are no knots that “belong” to me, in any sense, or even knots that I have “invented”. The simple knots we are talking here, are like elementary mathematical theorems, they are entities that are, in a sense, there, before us, and independently of our existence. Somebody happens, by pure luck, to meet them before somebody else. My intention was to discuss the definition of new knots I have tried to give in the first post f this topic, but it seems that I have failed ( once more… :))

Don’t take this the wrong way…

A lot of what you say is noise that I don’t want to hear. There are some good nuggets in there, but I actually do not have the time or motivation to discover them through all the noise. I’ll accept that it’s my loss, but I’ll live.

[Dan_Lehman]

@DerekSmith post:32

OK,
How would you ‘Properly Index’ this :-

Touche’ !

I see it as a seed or maybe 1st continuance of a sequence
that includes the blood knots but also pull-together
end-2-end joint of timber hitches --this knot being simple
enough to fit in either series. (But I do not see half-hitches
which are in a knot that can be seen to precede this one,
in simplicity --aka the grass bend. )

One can see the next in the series either wrapping a turn
more the tail around its own SPart or around both (blood ).

–dl*