This is Xarax’s previous input into the bowline I am promoting, along with an image titled “2a.JPG”. The link was provided above. A very limited contribution has now been acknowledged. Thank you, Xarax.
I have been chastised (in another thread) for daring to give a decent name to a knot that I found on my own and I alone am promoting. When someone points me to a published description/discussion where someone did not refer to the Mobius Bowline as lacking interest and called it’s image “2a” and made more than a spurious passing comment like “variation of the 1 loop”, I will stand corrected. There is way too much intellectual snobbery exercised by the old guard on this site sometimes.
As I am probably the only one who will ever use the Mobius Bowline regularly, I will call it what I like. Why should anyone really care what I choose to call a knot I alone use?