# Can someone identify this knot?

**URL:** https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931
**Category:** Decorative
**Created:** [3 December 2007 20:39 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931 "2007-12-03T20:39:41Z")
**Posts on this page:** 13
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BlindSquirrel](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/e9a140/32.png) [@BlindSquirrel](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/BlindSquirrel)
#### Post date: [3 December 2007 20:39 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/1 "2007-12-03T20:39:41Z")

</div>

I’m trying to replicate this knot…any guesses as to what it is?

[http://www.dualityentertainment.com/mike/XSWORD/XKNOT.jpg](http://www.dualityentertainment.com/mike/XSWORD/XKNOT.jpg)

in case this isn’t showing (as it won’t when I preview) you can down load it [http://www.dualityentertainment.com/mike/XSWORD/XKNOT.jpg](http://www.dualityentertainment.com/mike/XSWORD/XKNOT.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![KnotMe](https://discourse.igkt.net/user_avatar/discourse.igkt.net/knotme/32/5735_2.png) [@KnotMe](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/KnotMe)
#### Post date: [4 December 2007 17:20 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/2 "2007-12-04T17:20:33Z")

</div>

my kneejerk reaction is that it is a drawn knot with no real world analog, but i will have a scan through my tea bag knot books and see what I can turn up. certainly it is not a standard Chinese-style decorative knot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Pat\_Ducey](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/3ab097/32.png) [@Pat\_Ducey](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/Pat_Ducey)
#### Post date: [4 December 2007 19:53 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/3 "2007-12-04T19:53:50Z")

</div>

I agree with Carol, nice art, but not something that can be tied. Of course, I may be wrong.

Pat

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![turks\_head\_54](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/3ec8ea/32.png) [@turks\_head\_54](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/turks_head_54)
#### Post date: [5 December 2007 03:37 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/4 "2007-12-05T03:37:08Z")

</div>

It is possible to tie this knot. ;D

However you would need to use several endless loops of cord. 😢

TH54

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![DerekSmith](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/85e7bf/32.png) [@DerekSmith](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/DerekSmith)
#### Post date: [5 December 2007 09:57 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/5 "2007-12-05T09:57:53Z")

</div>

As a novice in the world of decoratives, could I ask those more skilled in this field to explain what they have seen in this sketch that suggests that this knot cannot be transposed to our physical 3D world?

Derek

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Pat\_Ducey](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/p/3ab097/32.png) [@Pat\_Ducey](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/Pat_Ducey)
#### Post date: [5 December 2007 20:13 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/6 "2007-12-05T20:13:38Z")

</div>

I just tried to follow one line, and I couldn’t. It didn’t have a continous path through the knot. Perhaps it coud be tied with several pieces of string to look like the artwork, but it probably wouldn’t be secure. There is also no structure to indicate how thick the center of the knot would be with all the loops coming in and going out. The loop of line that surrounds the center doesn’t appear to be connected to any other line. The three loops around the sleeve appear to be drawn as continous, and not part of the knot.

There is always a problem in translating artwork into a real knot. The “Live 8” concert a few months back is an example. The artwork on the concert poster suggested a figure of 8 knot, but tied in string it was an overhand knot. Decorative knotting on clothing often is sewn or glued on, and without the glue would fall apart into a clump of line. Often the “vision” of the artist is only a suggestion of the real world, and out brain can see the concept the artist wanted to impress upon us, but in the real world, the vision is only a mirage.

Pat

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![KnotMe](https://discourse.igkt.net/user_avatar/discourse.igkt.net/knotme/32/5735_2.png) [@KnotMe](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/KnotMe)
#### Post date: [6 December 2007 08:51 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/7 "2007-12-06T08:51:04Z")

</div>

(1) the knot was not immediately recognizable as belonging to any family of decorative knots with which I am familiar (and i know quite a few 8) 8)  
(2) the circle of cord around the middle was suspicious and doesn’t entirely look possible except as a separate circle

that said, it has the aspect of a Japanese tea bag knot (searching for shifuku will get you much further than tea 8)

the mokko flower knot has 4 big loops, but the centre structure is very different and the 2 side petals are not so round.  
the cherry blossom knot and bellflower knot have 5 petals, and 2 lines through the middle. there is a bottom centre loop, but no corresponding top centre loop (for a semi-circle vs circle effect)  
(kinda squashed, but in the top right corner of this image: [http://www.geocities.co.jp/PowderRoom/4101/hanamusubi1.jpg](http://www.geocities.co.jp/PowderRoom/4101/hanamusubi1.jpg), top view here: [http://www.junku.fr/images/exlarge\_pics/e\_6254.jpg](http://www.junku.fr/images/exlarge_pics/e_6254.jpg)).

here’s a couple of sites with a goodly number of pictures:  
[http://www.k4.dion.ne.jp/~shifuku/](http://www.k4.dion.ne.jp/~shifuku/)  
[http://blog.nakaji.moo.jp/?cid=25532](http://blog.nakaji.moo.jp/?cid=25532)

here’s an amazon japan book listing:  
[http://www.amazon.co.jp/くらしを楽しむ四季の花結び-田中-年子/dp/4473032523/ref=sr\_11\_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1196928799&sr=11-1](http://www.amazon.co.jp/%E3%81%8F%E3%82%89%E3%81%97%E3%82%92%E6%A5%BD%E3%81%97%E3%82%80%E5%9B%9B%E5%AD%A3%E3%81%AE%E8%8A%B1%E7%B5%90%E3%81%B3-%E7%94%B0%E4%B8%AD-%E5%B9%B4%E5%AD%90/dp/4473032523/ref=sr_11_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1196928799&sr=11-1)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Dan\_Lehman](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/7ba0ec/32.png) [@Dan\_Lehman](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/Dan_Lehman)
#### Post date: [11 December 2007 19:35 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/8 "2007-12-11T19:35:21Z")

</div>

> However you would need to use several endless loops of cord.

Maybe you'd like to explain how to do that? --for if you're talking about making the \*petals\* with such loops, you have to show how to get endless loops interlocked!

> [@KnotMe post:7](#):
>
> (1) the knot was not immediately recognizable as belonging to any family of decorative knots with which I am familiar (and i know quite a few 8) 8)  
> (2) the circle of cord around the middle was suspicious and doesn’t entirely look possible except as a separate circle  
> //  
> [.:.] my kneejerk reaction is that it is a drawn knot with no real world analog

I have quite the opposite reaction, as the illustration would be easier to make if it had nothing to try  
to represent, yet it isn’t so simply made. I.p., note that of the 4 _petals_–N-E-S-W, name them–the E  
one’s legs enter resp. OVER / UNDER, and not both one way or t’other, which would be the simplistic  
image. And as for that supposed “circle”, I think that if one scrutinizes the E side, you’ll see that it’s  
NOT there, and one sees instead one of the wrapping lines beneath the flower-knot. So, to my eye  
on a quick glance, it appears that some real knot WAS attempted to be accurately drawn; there are  
various places where what could’ve been more neatly shown as duplicate adjacent parts have some  
slight variance (such as the two parts at the flower’s center, and the wraps around the material which  
are carefully shown to overlap).

Btw, I (and Brian Grimley & Nautile) have had quite a time trying to decipher the S(h)amisen strings-anchor  
triple-eyed knot, w/o convincing success. Now, that knot is visible in several photos of the instrument,  
but nowhere have we (mostly BG, our Asian explorer, gem-finder) found instructions on how to tie this  
–as though it’s a secret art not to be divulged! One can BUY the pre-tied knot structure for use (but we’ve  
yet to do this, either.)

# –dl\*

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![oldpete](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/o/6a8cbe/32.png) [@oldpete](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/oldpete)
#### Post date: [12 December 2007 15:53 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/9 "2007-12-12T15:53:53Z")

</div>

I am new to knotting but I also feel that the can be tyed, the nearest I have found to it (not really near enough) is the four petalled flower knot based on a reef (square) knot given on page 162 of George Russell Shaw’s book on knots, with slight modification to that knot i have a knot that is very close to the one shown.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Znex](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/z/43a26b/32.png) [@Znex](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/Znex)
#### Post date: [12 December 2007 20:39 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/10 "2007-12-12T20:39:43Z")

</div>

> [@Dan\_Lehman post:8](#):
>
> Btw, I (and Brian Grimley & Nautile) have had quite a time trying to decipher the S(h)amisen strings-anchor  
> triple-eyed knot, w/o convincing success. Now, that knot is visible in several photos of the instrument,  
> but nowhere have we (mostly BG, our Asian explorer, gem-finder) found instructions on how to tie this  
> –as though it’s a secret art not to be divulged! One can BUY the pre-tied knot structure for use (but we’ve  
> yet to do this, either.)

Forgive me, this is somewhat off topic but I have found a video of tying the Shamisen knot and just wanted to share. I have not tried to tie it yet, but it looks doable.

[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXE9qeEwwGI&feature=related](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXE9qeEwwGI&feature=related)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![squarerigger](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/8491ac/32.png) [@squarerigger](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/squarerigger)
#### Post date: [13 December 2007 01:16 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/11 "2007-12-13T01:16:41Z")

</div>

Also off-topic I am going to boast a little and say that I showed this one at our meeting last night (the shamisen) and unfortunately, without the instrument, it doesn’t mean a whole lot to our rather practically-oriented folks. I did show that it holds a toggle at the end of the instrument and that the lower loops engage there, with the three separate top loops being available for stringing the instrument. Interesting, but having only one use, it was not given much attention.

SR

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Tom](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Tom](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/Tom)
#### Post date: [13 December 2007 11:10 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/12 "2007-12-13T11:10:30Z")

</div>

Blimey! I’ve just had a look at the Shamisen knot tying video - does that win the prize as ‘Most Complicated Knot with a Practical Purpose’? (and if not, what does?)  
What a beautiful thing - which, of course, should not preclude it from being useful!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![turks\_head\_54](https://discourse.igkt.net/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/3ec8ea/32.png) [@turks\_head\_54](https://discourse.igkt.net/u/turks_head_54)
#### Post date: [19 December 2007 05:53 UTC](https://discourse.igkt.net/t/can-someone-identify-this-knot/2931/13 "2007-12-19T05:53:44Z")

</div>

As soon as I get time I’ll take some photos of this knot being tied with several endless loops of cord.

TH54
