I forget what sent me to Mark’s An Analysis of Bowlines
paper, but on seeing Lee’s Link BWL I now saw that it
is … another loading of the same tangle that includes
the “Doubly HAH!” (“HAH” = “Happy As Harry (Asher)”)
(pseudo) BWL I’ve been fond of since whenever I first
discovered it, maybe ca. 2004!?
Their relationship is this : :
- Tail-Load the knot,
- then reverse all (i.e., of the 2- pieces in this 2-tangle,
1-2 & A-B, for each piece reverse its loading (so, 50-50%
will see no change, but 100-50 (S.Part → Outgoing Eye Leg)
will become 50-100, indicating a swap of duties).
(Or,I believe one can do the above in reverse order
–the Tail-Loading being 2nd.)
(-;
If you are referring to an end termination knot, these are the alternative loading profiles of Lee’s link bowline that i can think of, i doubt if there’s anything else, including of course the conventional one (which is either end loadable), with the two lines (SPart,tail) side by side ,parallel, exiting the nub.
Notes :
-
I kept the lines parallel (out-going, tail) for simplicity and better image resolution.
-
Of course, these are the non-TIB, loading profiles of Lee’s bwl (anti-knots?)
If none of the above, please provide more details such as, links, images and so on….
Edit: A slight modification at the lower knot
No ifs about it : I specified that, giving the operations
to move from either to the other --such as “Tail-loading”.
(It can help to use different ropes for the EK / 2-tangle’s
S.Part<->OELeg & REL<->Tail tangled pieces. And note
that the definition of EK --i.e., the Loading_Profile for
the tangle to get it-- doesn’t actually connect the two
eye legs, just gives their 50% loading together in oppostion
to the S.Part’s 100% --these tangle ends run though the
tangle isolation/view boundary/perimeter & out of this
formal consideration.
(Canonically, let’s label these pieces by their ends,
respectively, as pieces “1-2” & “A-B”.)
The Lee’s Link is a simplicity (1-2 a mere loop) completed
by a complexity (A-B making about double the entwining);
and Doubly HAH! is the opposite, the loop simplicity in A-B.
Among a mass of other “(pseudo) BWLs”, I’ve found one
general structure
. . (which I lately just noticed has an operational connection
. . . to the DblyHAH! clan, by folding back its eye collar
. . . to collar the S.Part & Tail)
that has 17 reasonable completion versions (!!),
all being (so I think) unique (albeit similar) tangles,
which being asymmetric means 8 (potential) EKs
per each, and … 115 dang EKs to check?
(NOT yet, anyway; I do want to do a few, though.)
–dl*
==== *