Simple wedged loop

This loop is the reverse version of a structure presented here a long time ago maybe by X; excuse me for not remembering the # of the post.
Edit 13 feb = Mobius and knotsaver recognize the Tugboat bowline
I show the simple version TIB’s method in order to get to the “double turn” which seems secure enough to serve as a middle of the line loop.
Pictures
Simple Structure = the reversed state of what I saw.
Simple-double-wedged-loop
Simple_Wedged-Loop = the making of
Simple_Double-wedged-loop = making of part 2


Simple_Wedged-Loop-.jpg

Hi enhaut,

Perhaps I am looking at it wrong, however isn’t the single loop version a ‘tugboat’ knot and the double looped version a ‘double dragon’? The double turn version might indeed be able to serve as a middle of the line loop, and I think this has been mooted before.

The creation of an end-to-end loaded eye knot (eg butterfly) that does not jam in its primary loading and in one (preferably both) single end loadings is quite tricky from the trials I have done.

Cheers,

mobius

The first image (simple structure) is shown in Harry Asher’s ‘The Alternative Knot Book’ at page 80. It is identified as an ‘Angler’s Loop’.

Also at ABok #1017 (Anglers Loop / Perfection loop)

I usually tie the Anglers Loop beginning from a slipped overhand knot.

@agent_smith and mobius

Thanks for the feedback,
I knew it had to be something already done but I missed the source.
agent_smith I assume you have tried the double version; is this an improvement?
mobius none jamming end-to-end loaded eye knot are not rare in this forum, and I think plenty are to be discover in the futur.

Edit; 12;39pm 12 feb
I just had a look at the angler’s loop wiki page.
It is not the same as the one shown here.
Tomorrow I will post some photos in order to compare and evaluate their differences.
Edit 13 feb = Mobius and knotsaver recognize the Tugboat bowline

@agent_smith
Here are the loops;
Top = The angler’s loop
Bottom = The no-named loop Edit 13 feb = Mobius and knotsaver recognize the Tugboat bowline
The differences are clear.
Citing Ashley on the angler’s loop;
“The ANGLER’S Loop has the best lead of any loop and is one
of the best of single loops for the ends of small lines such as fishline,
twine, etc. But as it jams, it is not suitable for rope.”
The loop unknown loop in this thread will not jam; the wedging tail provides enough breaking power to lock the loop.
The angler’s is built to sustain tension in this simple form the other asks for a double wedged as shown in the first post in order to be stable.
Pictures = Comparison
= Minus 28 celsius plus fresh snow this morning

Hi enhaut,
as mobius noticed, it is a Tugboat B knot.
You can find it here

[Edit] this is the correct url now (18/10/25)
https://daveroot.neocities.org/knots/Knots_SingleLoops.html

[Edit]
http://www.southee.com/Knots/Knots_SingleLoops.htm
and in an old topic here (without pictures!?)
http://igkt.net/sm/index.php?topic=112.0
ciao,
s.

@ knotsaver
Yes thanks for the link and the precision; it is a Tugboat Bowline.
I am surprise to find that this loop deserves the bowline attribute.
My point being that with two wedging turn the whole structure becomes strong, reliable and remains TIB.

The double turn version is the ‘double dragon’ and is provided in the same link knotsaver gave us : http://www.southee.com/Knots/Knots_SingleLoops.htm

The Double Dragon is a nice eye knot in my opinion. Easy to tie TIB and it has survived a few tugs on my rig to my satisfaction, for what that is worth.

Cheers,

mobius

For the sake of precision it’s a Tugboat (version) B (the “B” isn’t B as Bowline), it’s different from the Tugboat version A (the Dragon) and from the Tugboat C (the Angler) (as I’ve got it! :slight_smile: )
(EDIT: the knot (showed by enhaut) is a mirror image of the Tugboat B at the cited URL)

It should be a Double Tugboat B, the Double Dragon should be a Double Tugboat A (they are different!) (again, as I’ve got it! :slight_smile: ).

ciao,
s.

@knotsaver
Well spotted!
Correction has been made.
Now you’ll be able to tie this Double Tugboat and appreciate how fast it can be done.

I ignored the original diagram mistake and used it to tie what I believed was a Double Dragon before my first post comments. Indeed, isn’t the tugboat ‘bowline’ simply a one turn Double Dragon? What is the difference?

Cheers,

mobius

Hi mobius,
please look at the
section 13. Perfection Loop (Angler’s Loop, ABOK #1017, ABOK #1035) and Tugboat Bowline (Flying Bowline) of Knots_SingleLoops at

[Edit]
this is the correct url now (18/10/25)

[Edit]
(look at the pictures! the KnotMaker diagram of the Tugboat A is wrong!?).
Follow the path from the Standing End to the Tail and you’ll see the difference!

Using the original (wrong) diagram of the Simple_Double-wedged-loop , the same Simple_Wedged-Loop (Tugboat B) was obtained!

Ciao,
s.

Hi enhaut,
it’s a good method, but look at 00:43 of the video posted by JD here
http://igkt.net/sm/index.php?topic=5632.msg38374#msg38374

or watch a video made by Alan Lee here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxrZ7bKEwQc

with the torsion of the bight (in the left hand) you obtain an Angler’s Loop,
without the torsion of the bight you obtain a Tugboat B (a Flying Bowline)

(the methods in the videos are for the simple (not double) loop)

ciao,
s.

Nice pickup knotsaver, one twist different makes it not a Double Dragon.

Cheers,

mobius

Lovely winter setting !!

The knots comparision would be clearer IMO were the lower
image flipped to show the opposite face --and tail would now
point upwards at the other’s tail (I guess you aligned per tail?).

FYI, I’ve found once the perfection/angler’s loop tied in rope
of about half-inch diameter in some boating ropes by a dock,
seemingly used qua mid-line eye knot. (attached)

–dl*


@ Dan_Lehman

(I guess you aligned per tail?)
Yes, and; My rational was to show the nipping part in the continuation of the SE. Your finding in the wild is interesting, showing abok# 1017 in the same orientation as in the book. Some bold boaters have clearly not followed Ashley's recommendation. ;D ;D ;D

@ Dan_Lehman
Since I already have the pictures why not present the comparison as you wish it should be done.

Picture = Comparison 2