Poll on Round Turn description

Whatever is indicated…

2 degrees turn
90 degrees turn
180 degrees turn
270 degrees turn

Now, if you asked me “How many degrees are in a wrap of rope in your opinion?”, then my answer would be 360 degrees.

Saying “turn” to mean 360 degrees is just lazy communication. For comparison, people usually say “strength” when they actually mean “security”.

Back to the original question, how many degrees is a Round Turn?

For about the fifth time, if someone says “add 3 Round Turns”, then the correct response is to add 3 x 360 degrees of turn. There is no mind trick, philosophical debate or new definition needed. There is no situation where Round Turn means 540 degrees. Again, in the knot “Round Turn and Two Half Hitches”, the initial 180 degrees is implied, and the Round Turn is still 360 degrees.

I might add 360 degrees, but adding 270 degrees could also be correct depending on the application. In contrast, adding a Round Turn specifically means adding 360 degrees of turn, and that’s the question at hand. I won’t look down on you if you change your vote. ;D

By the way, no, you did not answer my question, if someone says add 3 Round Turns, how many degrees of turn are you going to add?

Hey, there’s no need to get pissy. It’s just math, and frankly is not difficult math.

Wow, seriously? OK, let’s try this another way.

How many degrees of turn does 3 Round Turns have?

Here’s another example.

Consider I tied a Buntline Hitch. Now, consider I tied a Buntline Hitch with a Round Turn. How many degrees of turn did I add with that Round Turn? I’m asking for a number, not a link to Dictionary.com.

Here’s my answer: I added 360 degrees of turn when I added the Round Turn. The Buntline Hitch already has a 180 degree turn around the object. The confusion is people thinking the 180 degrees is part of the Round Turn. No! The 180 degrees is already there before the Round Turn is added.

There is none. The 180 degrees of initial turn is already there in just about every hitch. I keep saying this. If you add a Round Turn, you’re adding 360 degrees to the 180 degrees that’s already there in the hitch, but the 180 degrees is not part of the Round Turn.

Fail. YOU have spoken like that:

http://igkt.net/sm/index.php?topic=1150.msg7863#msg7863

You’re talking about adding 2 x 360 degrees of turn, not 2 x 540 degrees.

Here’s another experienced knot tier (Inkanyezi) who speaks like that:

http://igkt.net/sm/index.php?topic=1379.msg9736#msg9736

He’s talking about adding 360 degrees of turn, not 540 degrees.

I guess it takes a new person (who also has over 15 years engineering experience) to expose Ashley’s non-workable definition. What we have here is a fine example of group think. It’s otherwise smart people ignoring plain truths just so that they don’t venture outside the group. Not comparing myself to Einstein, but note that Einstein exposed fallacies of hundred of years of Newtonian physics in order to formulate his theories of Relativity.

ABOK #36 shows a Round Turn that includes about 360 degrees.
ABOK #42 shows Two Round Turns that include about 2 x 360 degrees with 180 degrees that are implied.
ABOK #37 shows a Round Turn plus an Elbow as being about 540 degrees.
ABOK #40 shows a Single Turn as being about 180 degrees.

I guess the “experts” here need to study ABOK a little bit more, or maybe don’t refer to Ashley anymore.

Again, ABOK #42 shows Two Round Turns that include 2 x 360 degrees with 180 degrees that are implied.

You’re running out of ways a round this, pun intented…

I also notice you ignored Ashley’s description of a “single turn”.

LOL, that’s super confusing. Let’s all ignore ABOK and conform to Roo’s world. In order for that to make sense, I have to ignore your definition of a Round Turn being 540 degrees.

My confusion that what you’re saying is not consistent with the ABOK references I posted. I can’t tell somebody a Round Turn equals 540 degrees and then expect to make sense out of the ABOK references I posted. That’s because a Round Turn is not 540 degrees.

??? Evidence is piling up?

According to what I’ve seen, there is only one diagram that is causing this confusion that a Round Turn is 540 degrees (it’s not). The diagram is ABOK #41 (or any diagram mimicking that). In that diagram, the Round Turn is actually 360 degrees, and there is an implied 180 degrees turn.

In every other instance of a Round Turn, it clearly makes no sense to define a Round Turn as 540 degrees. As just a few examples, the definition of 540 degrees clearly breaks down for the following:

-Two Round Turns (ABOK #42)
-Three Round Turns, and so on
-ABOK #36
-ABOK #37